<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fidelity Targets Retirement Income Needs</title>
	<link>http://www.fundmasteryblog.com/2007/10/13/fidelity-targets-retirement-income-needs/</link>
	<description>Mutual Funds, Investing, Retirement, Economy, Personal Finance</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shawn S</title>
		<link>http://www.fundmasteryblog.com/2007/10/13/fidelity-targets-retirement-income-needs/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fundmasteryblog.com/2007/10/13/fidelity-targets-retirement-income-needs/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>I like your spin on 30 year Treasury bonds as being a guaranteed income for life.  I think a lot of people are simply attracted to the words "guaranteed income for life".  If people thought of the bonds (secured, high quality) in this light, then we could essential eliminate the need for annuities.  I guess that's where the sales tactics and marketing comes in to entice clients to park their money with the insurance company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your spin on 30 year Treasury bonds as being a guaranteed income for life.  I think a lot of people are simply attracted to the words &#8220;guaranteed income for life&#8221;.  If people thought of the bonds (secured, high quality) in this light, then we could essential eliminate the need for annuities.  I guess that&#8217;s where the sales tactics and marketing comes in to entice clients to park their money with the insurance company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
