Fundmastery Blog

Mutual Funds, Investing, Retirement, Economy, Personal Finance


  • Home
  • About
  • Disclaimer
  • Information & Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

Net Worth Grows Despite Real Estate Woes

Kurt Brouwer December 7th, 2007

Sorry for the bad rhyme in the title. I just could not help myself. The Wall Street Journal’s Real Time Economics Blog reports on the quarterly data from the Feds on household net worth. Net worth actually grew in the third quarter, despite a decline in home equity [emphasis added below]:

Homeowners’ Real-Estate Equity Tumbles (Real Time Economics Blog, December 7, 2007)

‘The latest set of figures to capture the housing bubble’s deflation: today’s quarterly flow of funds data from the Federal Reserve.

U.S. homeowners’ real estate equity dropped a record $128.5 billion, or 1.2%, in the third quarter to $10.6 trillion as home prices fell and mortgage debt rose. That’s the second quarterly decline after surging 38% from 2002 through the end of last year. In the second quarter of this year, homeowners’ equity dropped by $31.4 billion from the peak, $10.7 trillion, reached in the first quarter.

But the housing contraction still hasn’t pushed overall household wealth into negative territory. Net worth rose 1.1% in the third quarter to $58.6 trillion, slower than the 1.9% gain in the second quarter, the Fed said. (The total value of household assets rose $858 billion to $72.8 trillion; liabilities climbed $234 billion to $14.2 trillion.)’

Based on many articles I see, you would think Americans were one step away from financial catastrophe. Yet, net worth actually grew during a period of housing retrenchment. And, don’t get me started on the absurd claims that we are not saving. This issue of the dire status of Americans’ propensity to save is simply not accurate. In Good News on the Declining Dollar, Savings and More, we covered this issue in a bit more depth. In that post, we quoted Gerard Baker as follows [emphasis added below]:

‘…If you look at a simple measure such as the savings rate — the proportion of income that is saved rather than spent — Americans do look pretty spendthrift. It is close to zero in the US, compared with 10 per cent in Europe and much higher in Asia. But focusing on this one measure distorts the full picture of America’s household balance sheets. The reality is this: why save when the value of the investments you own is increasing at rapid rates? The total value of mortgage and consumer debt is indeed up by a massive $5 trillion since 2001, according to the latest figures published by the Federal Reserve.

But consider the increases in the wealth of Americans during that period. The aggregate value of houses alone is up $8 trillion. The increase in the value of stocks held either directly or through pension funds and other investment instruments is higher by another $8 trillion. That’s an increase in net wealth of American households of $11 trillion in less than six years. That’s about $90,000 for every household in the country. As someone once said, 11 trillion dollars here and 11 trillion dollars there and pretty soon you’re talking serious money…’

Many people who bemoan our national savings rate do not realize that the savings rate statistic does not include most investments nor does it include assets in retirement plans or even home equity. For more on this, see $57.9 Trillion — American Net Worth.

Net worth is the name of the game, not bank accounts and other low return forms of savings. Our net worth went up because we invest in homes and other real estate, in businesses, in stocks and bonds and many other types of investment.

 

  • Economy , Investing , Money
  • Comments(0)

Did you enjoy this article?

  • Subscribe to Fundmastery Blog by e-mail »
  • Subscribe to Fundmastery Blog's RSS feed RSS Icon

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

  • Subscribe to E-mail

    • Enter your email address to receive daily e-mail alerts from Fundmastery Blog:


      We value your privacy.
    • Subscribe to our feed Feed icon
  • Subscribe to RSS

    • Posts
    • Comments
  • About Us

    • Kurt Brouwer is chairman of Brouwer & Janachowski, a financial advisory firm based in northern California.
  • Most Popular Posts

    • How Far Has the Dollar Fallen? And Why? -- What's Next?
    • Good News on the Declining Dollar, Savings & More
    • How Far Has the Dollar Climbed? And Why?
    • Amsterdam Real Estate Near High Point of 1736
    • National Debt At $9 Trillion
  • Categories

    • Blogging
    • Business
    • debt
    • Economy
    • Energy
    • ETF
    • Geopolitics
    • Hedge Funds
    • income taxes
    • inflation
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Mutual Funds
    • Personal Finance
    • Retirement
    • Uncategorized
  • Archives

    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
  • Tags

    $93 200 billion 508 points 1987 American annuities balance billion Bloomberg budget Business capital gains Case-Schiller Index China Crash debt decline Deere deficit dollar dollar. Euro doom Economy employment euro falling financial adviser funds government government spending healthcare health insurance hyper inflation income for life income taxes inflation interest rates Investing Ip IRS jobs MarketWatch Mutual Funds Retirement Wall Street Journal

  • Blogroll

    • Abnormal Returns
    • Calculated Risk
    • Carpe Diem
    • Curious Capitalist
    • Financial Times / Allphaville
    • Greg Mankiw
    • James Pethokoukis
    • Larry Kudlow
    • Marginal Revolution
    • MarketBeat
    • MarketWatch
    • Real Clear Markets
    • Real Time Economics
    • Skeptical Optimist
Fundmastery Blog. © 2009 All rights reserved.
WordPress Themes based on a design by NodeThirtyThree